Custom Search
Showing posts with label potassium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label potassium. Show all posts

Observations from Wisconsin and How Dr. Soldat Would Manage Potassium on Cool-Season Turf


Hello again from the Midwest. Its be a while since I have posted and its because old man winter will not relinquish his grip on us. We have only had the opportunity to rate one of our 5 snow mold sites. Last week three of our sites received another 5 to 12 inches of snow. Where the snow has melted, I am assuming winter kill and breakthrough were minimal. My only metric to assess this is my phone has been eerily quiet. So since I do not have much to report on with respect diseases, I am privileged to post comments from Dr. Doug Soldat on managing potassium on cool-season turf. I think this fits well into the discuss John started concerning Poa management.

Turf Diseases Blog: How I’d Manage Potassium on Cool-Season Turf
Doug Soldat
Dept. of Soil Science
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Over the last several years as the turfgrass nutrient and water specialist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, I’ve slowly been developing my philosophy of potassium management based on my research, the scientific literature, theory and observation. I teach my view point every fall to a group of students who are too green to be shocked, but when I revealed my philosophy to a group of workshop attendees at the Canadian International Turfgrass Conference in Vancouver in March, it was clear that my recommendations were a major reversal from what they’ve been taught. Similarly, you may have heard Dr. Rossi (Cornell) and Dr. Gaussoin (Nebraska) debate the importance of potassium at GIS and elsewhere. So, I thought I’d throw my hat into the ring; and because disease plays a major role in my management philosophy, I’d thought I share my thoughts with this community. A much more detailed defense of the ideas below will be published in the Grass Roots in June (official publication of the Wisconsin GCSA). I’d be happy to email you a copy of that when it’s available, just let me know djsoldat@wisc.edu. So, without further ado, here’s how I’d manage potassium if I were a Golf Course Superintendent:

Fairways:
I’d apply potassium only according to soil test levels. I’d use modern interpretations of optimum (i.e. 50-100 ppm, depending on soil test) instead of the more common values of 200-400 ppm. I expect even the 50-100 ppm levels will be adjusted downward as more soil test calibration studies are conducted, but for now 50-100 is fine.

If/when potassium dips below that soil test threshold, I’d make a 1 lb/M application in May. I’d re-test the soil in fall to determine if another application is warranted the following spring. Why May? The evidence for potassium improving drought tolerance is much more convincing that the evidence that potassium increases winter hardiness (although, I believe the opposite is true for warm season grasses). Also, Dave Moody and Frank Rossi’s work at Cornell University has clearly linked increased potassium in the leaf to increased severity of gray snow mold (and pink to a lesser extent). Similarly, Dr. Ebdon et al. (2006 – Mass.) reported more severe gray snow mold at higher K application rates on ryegrass. In summary: there is only weak evidence that K increases cold tolerance for cool season-grasses, strong evidence that it increases snow mold, decent evidence that it improves drought tolerance. I’d go with May.

If my fairways were something other than sand, I’d apply muriate of potash (0-0-60), if they were sandy, I’d consider using a polymer coated K source or spoon feeding in 0.25 lb/M increments if practical. Most non-sand soils have a high enough cation exchange capacity to retain a 1 lb/M application of potassium. Sandy soils may need some help provided by the polymer coating or spoon feeding approach.

Greens:
Assuming most greens are sand-based, either from construction or years of topdressing, I’d spoon feed potassium along with nitrogen in the ratio of 2 parts nitrogen to 1 part potassium beginning in May and ending in August (but continuing with N after that). I like to fertilize my research greens about every other week with 0.2 lbs N/M as urea, so that’d put me at 0.1 lbs K2O/M per application or about 1.0 lbs/M for the season. I feel this is a very conservative approach which replaces the potassium removed by clippings. But as the research continues to unfold, I can imagine that my management philosophy for greens may evolve to look more like my fairway program. That said, if I were an actual superintendent, I’d leave the research to the researchers and use this conservative but research-based approach.

Why stop in August? Same philosophy as above, the benefits of potassium as a drought stress nutrient are much more convincing that the cold tolerance argument and we have seen that high tissue K increases snow mold pressure. Also, research by Woods et al. (2006 – New York) and Johnson et al. (2003 - Utah) has shown clearly that high soil potassium levels in sand based greens are always substantially reduced by spring, presumably by the snow melt leaching the potassium out of the root zone. Therefore, a large application to a sand root zone in fall will do two things: increase your susceptibility to gray snow mold, and 2) leach out of the root zone, becoming unavailable in spring resulting in a complete waste of time and resources.

One Final Note:
All this talk recently about fostering an environment that favors bent over Poa makes me wonder why a superintendent with such a mindset would want to apply any potassium at all. Poa is obviously more susceptible to heat, drought, and cold stress than bentgrass, so why apply a nutrient that supposedly increases tolerance to those things? Yet, I’ve not heard mention of potassium management as a key strategy. I’m not saying it should be -- I tend to think we’ve overestimated the role of potassium in stress tolerance —it’s just interesting that potassium has been left out of the discussion so far.

Potassium, Hokkaido, and Snow Mold


I'm at snow-covered Hokkaido for some seminars this week and one of the things I have mentioned in the seminars is the possible increase in snow mold damage that can occur with high rates of potassium application in the fall season. Dr. Kerns mentioned the research being done at Cornell now to investigate this phenomenon.

We came across this observation on an L-93 field trial that we had designed to study soil testing methods, not snow mold. What we found, as you see below, is that plots treated with potassium in the previous year (and to which no fungicides were applied to prevent snow mold) had an increase in snow mold damage compared with plots to which no potassium had been applied in the previous year.


In both 2003 and 2004, when the snow had melted from the research green, we observed a linear increase in gray snow mold damage with increasing rates of potassium application.

Hokkaido has heavy snow mold pressure. Many of the golf courses are under snow for four months. The photo below shows the effect of fungicide application in the fall (at right) vs. no fungicide (at left) in the snow mold damage to a golf course rough at Obihiro in mid-May. Clearly, one would not want to exacerbate the disease intensity by unwarranted application of potassium.

Things to Consider Post PCNB Stop Sale Order



Hello again, its been a few weeks since I have posted anything. Except for the news about PCNB, the fall has been exceptional in the Midwest. Temperatures have been very conducive for golf, almost too conducive. I wonder if those who lost turf this summer had any difficulty recovering because of too much traffic during the fall season. Samples completely halted at the Turfgrass Diagnostic Lab around October 1st, mainly because we were fairly dry. The only disease that proliferated during the fall was rust, even some golf course superintendents called about massive amounts of rust in the roughs.

For those that had to select an alternative to PCNB there are a few things to consider for next year. First, one of the beauties of PCNB was its long residual control of Microdochium patch. Thus if Microdochium patch is observed after melt, than a follow-up fungicide application maybe warranted. Our research has shown that the fungicides iprodione and chlorothalonil only provide about 30 to 40 days of Microdochium patch control under winter conditions. Interesting enough we did not see extended control when comparing plots covered in snow versus those plots that were kept uncovered. The image above shows the length of control we observed with chlorothalonil. In other words, do not blame your snow mold fungicide mixture if new Microdochium patch infection centers develop during the spring immediately following melt.

The other thing to keep in mind is the issue with PCNB has not been resolved, at least not to my knowledge. Basically it would be wise to think about budgeting for snow mold without using PCNB as an option. That way you are prepared if the stop sale is not lifted. There are a number of options that I have already covered in previous posts, but feel free to contact us if you want to discuss other options for next year.

Most of the bloggers attended in the Agronomy meetings in Long Beach, California last week. I love these meetings because of the breadth of information presented. One of my favorite talks from the meetings, besides my own students', was given by one of Dr. Frank Rossi's students David Moody. He has determined that potassium applications in the fall may make turf more susceptible to snow mold damage. They established a very elaborate growth chamber experiment to test this hypothesis, but they stumbled upon this observed causally in the field. Basically they think the excess potassium stimulates the plant to shuttle potassium, citrate and malate into the vacuole in order to maintain osmotic potential. In turn this shift in osmotic potential slows down the production of carbon skeletons and energy, which are essential to plant defense. I believe this was the first or second year of David's research and I will be interested to follow his results and progress.

One of the highlights of the meeting was an outside meeting to discuss a proposal for a Multi-State Regional Project on Dollar spot research. This is a formal process that will allow all those who participate to meet once a year to discuss dollar spot research. Originally this idea was spearheaded by Dr. Mike Boehm at Ohio State University, but the reins was passed to Lane upon Dr. Boehm's promotion into upper administration at Ohio State. The beauty of this meeting was hearing what everyone was doing and realizing that very few turf programs overlap with respect to dollar spot research. This project has a five year term, so maybe in five years we will have a better handle on the biology of dollar spot!

Stay tuned next week as we start a series of discussions on the newer fungicides released in the past couple years!

Impact of nitrogen sources on spring dead spot


In a post earlier this spring, I briefly mentioned our recent findings on the impact of nitrogen sources on spring dead spot development in bermudagrass turf. I am preparing to present this research at the upcoming American Phytopathological Society Meetings in Portland, OR and thought I would provide everyone with a sneak peek of our findings.

Most turf managers in the southeast and midwest are all too familiar with spring dead spot. However, in light of the results below, it is important to realize that the disease is caused by three different species: Ophiosphaerella herpotricha, O. korrae, and O. narmari. The most common species in the southeastern US is O. korrae, whereas O. herpotricha is prevalent in the midwestern US. If you are unsure of which species you have, ask your friendly neighborhood turf pathologist to find out which species is most common in your area.

We initiated this research in 2004 to determine how fertilization programs influence these different spring dead spot species. Each plot was inoculated with O. korrae and O. herpotricha in Fall 2004, fertilization treatments were initiated in May 2006, and were continued through 2007 and 2008.

Some of the main findings of this research are as follows:
  1. Spring dead spot caused by O. herpotricha was suppressed very effectively in all 3 years by fertilization with ammonium sulfate. Sulfur coated urea provided some control in 2008, and calcium nitrate provided moderate suppression in 2009.
  2. Ammonium sulfate had no effect whatsoever on spring dead spot caused by O. korrae. Instead, calcium nitrate provided almost complete control of this species in all 3 years.
  3. Fall applications of potassium, dolomitic lime, gypsum, or elemental sulfur had no effect on either spring dead spot pathogen.




What does this mean? We are unsure at this time if the observed spring dead spot suppression is due to changes in soil pH or other nutritional effects. For example, suppression of O. korrae by caclium nitrate may be due to higher soil pH or increased calcium availability. Regardless, if you have struggled with spring dead spot in the past, take a look at the nitrogen source you've been using and consider a change to either calcium nitrate or ammonium sulfate.

Many turf managers apply potassium in the fall, as this has been thought to help reduce spring dead spot development. During the three years of this study, we saw no benefit from fall applications of potassium or other nutrients. It is important to point out, however, that we applied 2.7 lbs K/1000 sq ft from potassium chloride (0-0-60) during the summer in conjunction with our nitrogen applications. Therefore, as long as adequate amounts of potassium are applied during the season, additional fall applications do not appear to influence spring dead spot development.
Related Posts with Thumbnails